(Updated) Election Analysis by Jeffrey Winters (10 April 2009)
 
Here are some back-of-the-envelope calculations and scenarios based on early 
“quick count” results from the 9 April 2009 Parliamentary DPR elections 
(available as of 10 pm Jakarta time on 10 April). Final vote counts could vary 
from these numbers, but most of the analysis presented would hold:
 
[If the five columns are formatted wrong, they should be Party; Avg 2009 %; Est 
2009 Seats; 2004 %; and 2004 Seats]
 
                        Avg     Est.
                        2009    2009    2004    2004
PARTY               %        Seats    %        Seats
----------------------------------------------------
Demokrat         20.4     141        7.5       55
Golkar             14.6     100       21.6     128
PDIP                14.2       98       18.5     109
PKS                   7.6       53         7.3      45
PAN                   5.7       39         6.4      53
PPP                   5.3       36         8.2      58
PKB                   5.2       36        10.6      52
Gerindra            4.9       34           0        0      
Hanura              3.5       24           0        0
----------------------------------------------------
                        81.3%  560 seats
 
First some basic information and assumptions. Column one is an average of the 4 
“quick counts” done by Lembaga Survei Indonesia, Lembaga Survei Nasional, 
Lingkaran Survei Indonesia, and CIRUS Surveyors Group. Only the nine parties 
listed above appear likely to reach the 2.5% popular vote threshold needed to 
get even a single seat in the 560-seat DPR. These nine parties constitute 81.3% 
of the total vote (which would have yielded only 455 seats without the 
exclusionary rule). These nine parties will divide among themselves the 
remaining 105 seats in the DPR the smaller parties would have gotten. The 
numbers of seats in column two are very rough estimates, as percentages of 
popular vote give only an indication of actual seats won.
 
As expected, no party got the 25% of the popular vote needed to run a 
presidential candidate, although, also as expected, SBY’s PD is the only party 
to get the 20% of the DPR seats (112) needed to run a candidate solo.
 
Alliances for the Presidency
 
SBY is likely to ally with PKS and PKB (neither is likely to ally with 
PDIP-Mega or Gerindra-Prabowo). This would give SBY a comfortable 230-seat 
base. Barring something dramatic happening with Golkar (see below), SBY might 
even offer PKS the vice-presidency.
 
The current strategy is for PDIP-Mega to ally with Golkar-Kalla. This would 
give Mega an easy 198 seats as a base for her run with Kalla once again as VP 
(and promises of a dominant role in domestic affairs). But if there is major 
Golkar drama (see below), Mega would have to find another ally.
 
The big question is whether there will be a third candidate. Gerindra-Prabowo 
must assemble 112 seats to run. If the alliances mentioned above hold, then 
there are only 132 seats left for grabs. Gerindra will get around 34. This is 
quite a splash for a one-year old party, but Prabowo needed to do a lot better. 
To get to 112 seats Prabowo must somehow get PAN (39) and PPP (36) and Hanura 
(24) to back him. PAN and PPP lean toward SBY but could be lured away 
(especially if money and several cabinet posts are offered). But the huge 
challenge is getting Hanura-Wiranto to sign on. There is a history of deep 
conflict between these two generals. Unless the final vote counts and seats 
work in Prabowo’s favor, he will only have 108 of the 112 needed to run without 
Wiranto.  So getting Wiranto becomes a must.
 
Golkar Drama
 
As expected, Golkar’s performance was poor, dropping from 21.6 percent of the 
vote in 2004 to a pathetic 14.6 percent this round (a third of the party’s 
voter base lost). Golkar is chock full of figures plotting to re-take the party 
if the elections were to go badly under Kalla’s leadership. The top plotter is 
Akbar Tanjung, who wants to hold an Extraordinary National Convention 
(Munaslub) in May to push Kalla aside for failing the party. Nothing major 
happens in Golkar without tons of money, and Akbar doesn’t have much. But 
replacing Kalla would be a major boon to SBY, as it would pave the way for 
re-allying with Golkar-Akbar (with Akbar as the VP). This would devastate SBY’s 
opponents and cause a cascade effect in the alliance structure. Mega’s alliance 
with Golkar-Kalla would be history. Her search for a replacement ally to reach 
the 112-seat threshold could threaten to eliminate Prabowo from the 
presidential race. SBY could easily raise
 the funds needed to back Abkar’s putsch within Golkar. Doing so would all but 
assure SBY’s second term.
 
Rizal Ramli and One Last Scenario
 
There is one other interesting possibility that could arise, though the chances 
are remote. Rizal Ramli is the only non-New Order figure of prominence in the 
race. Problem is, he has no party. Instead, he heads the “Change Blok,” which 
is made up of many of the parties (nearly 18% of the total vote collectively) 
that are cut out of the action because they did not reach the 2.5% threshold.
 
Rizal cannot get 20% of the seats with this hodge- podge of parties because 
they get no seats. But a candidate can still run for the presidency with 25% of 
the popular vote. This is a tall order. Rizal would have to get all the 
excluded parties plus one or two of the parties that did reach the threshold to 
join together.
 
Alternatively, Prabowo and his allies could ally with Rizal and his Change Blok 
and reach the 25% popular vote threshold. The same holds true for Wiranto and 
his Hanura party. These popular-vote scenarios assume the more than two dozen 
fractional parties could be held together and not be picked off using money by 
the big players. Prabowo has the money to fend off such money challenges from 
Mega and SBY, but Rizal does not.
 
Jeffrey Winters
Northwestern University, Chicago
April 10, 2009


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke