Ian,
I can confirm that I see similar problems. I have several designs
which do not quite make sense as to how the re-annotation was conducted. As
you state some of the annotation looks exactly as expected but then there
are anomalies throughout some sections or component types. Bug, I don't
quite expect so. The issue is probably in how it partitions a sheet for
annotation and how the components may possibly overhang into other areas of
the screen because of fields or other items (some may not be visible, i.e.
partfields 1 - 16).
Brad Velander,
Lead PCB Designer,
Norsat International Inc.,
#300 - 4401 Still Creek Dr.,
Burnaby, B.C., V5C 6G9.
Tel. (604) 292-9089 direct
Fax (604) 292-9010
website www.norsat.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Rozowsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:48 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: [PEDA] :Positional re-annotation
>
>
> Hi all
>
> Is it just me, or does positional re-annotation not work too
> well? A colleague of mine has a PCB with around 300
> components. When he selects re-annotate, the result is not as
> expected - some components are re-annotated in the expected
> sequence, but others are not. Is this a bug, or am I missing a point?
>
> Regards
>
> Ian Rozowsky
> Engineering Manager
> Centurion Systems
> P.O. Box 506
> Cramerview 2060
> South Africa
> Tel : +27-11-462-4499
> Fax : +27-11-704-3412
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web: http://www.centsys.co.za
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
* - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
