I'm just connecting pins to ports with the unnamed nets (i.e., wires).
All my busses are named -- I think I recall seeing the problem you describe
with unnamed busses.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:35 AM
>
> Are your unnamed nets connecting ports, nets or busses?
>
> It is my experience that nets do not need names to work and
> Busses need to
> be named.
>
> I was trying to point this out since I and coworkers of mine have been
> bitten by not having a name on a bus that connected two sheet entry
symbols
> with "Sheet Symbol/Port Connections". The Netlister generated two busses,
> one for each page instead of one bus. When the bus was named on the top
> sheet the netlister connected the two sheets and generated one bus.
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Rob
>
> "Dwight Harm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/12/2001 02:59:27 AM
> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> A clarification -- wiring to ports is not always "just for
> the viewer". I use "Sheet symbol/Port connections" with a hierarchical
> project, and often have unnamed nets connected to ports.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
* - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *