I second Josh, I had RTKLIB running on Olinuxino iMX233.. rubbish floating point but still could do 2Hz off a uBlox NEO6P :)

Michele


On 03/10/2013 00:04, Josh Leighton wrote:
Hi Weber,

There's nothing specific to the A9 that would make compiling RTKLib a problem. Whether you encounter trouble will most likely depend on what linux distribution you end up running.

We compile the linux kernel ourselves so we can build our own debian image, where apt-get makes life pretty easy when it comes to compiling RTKLib or other such libraries. Depending on the community support for your hardware and what pre-built images are available, debian may or may not be an option for you. I always recommend others to use debian because it makes package management and compatibility so easy.

I don't think RTKLib has many dependencies though, so regardless of what you're running you should have an easy time of it.

Best of luck,
-Josh


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:32 PM, weber de souza calixto <webersouzacali...@gmail.com <mailto:webersouzacali...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Josh,

    I'm back on this project.

    A question: Did you have problems to compile RTKLib to A9 processor?

    In the following weeks I will to compile it, I'm just waiting my
    dev board to arrive
    (http://br.embeddeddeveloper.com/tools/2654/Newark-element14/MCIMX6Q-SL.htm)

    Weber




    2013/8/22 weber de souza calixto <webersouzacali...@gmail.com
    <mailto:webersouzacali...@gmail.com>>

        Hi,

        Josh thanks for sharing your experience. Sure it is helping me
        a lot to choose the processing platform. Right now I`m
        inclined to choose a quad-core 1.2 Ghz A9 to start testing.

        Danny, to use raspberry or beaglebone is dependant on your
        needs. In my case I cant wait RTKLib to compute and then shoot
        the picture. Airplanes can`t hover :)

        Weber


        2013/8/22 Danny Miller <dan...@austin.rr.com
        <mailto:dan...@austin.rr.com>>

            What about Raspberry Pi and Beaglebone Black?

            Danny


            On 8/21/2013 7:42 PM, Josh Leighton wrote:
            While I can't speak very scientifically, I can report on
            our experiences running rtklib on gumstix embedded linux
            computers.  Previous we used a Gumstix Overo with an ARM
            cortex-A8 (single core) at 800MHz I believe.  We couldn't
            reliably do more than 1Hz RTK alongside the other
            processes we were running.  If I recall correctly,
            rtknavi was using ~15% cpu at 1Hz.

            Now with a Duovero (dual core, arm cortex-A9 at 1GHz) we
            have no problem running RTK at 5Hz.  Cpu usage is still
            around 15%.

            Hope that's of some help to you.

            -Josh


            On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Weber
            <webersouzacali...@gmail.com
            <mailto:webersouzacali...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                Hi all,

                Question: How much processing power to get real time
                RTK corrections from RTKLib?
                I'm thinking of using uBlox LEA-6T-0 (5 Hz RAW
                update) on both basestation and rover (a UAV), with
                RTKNAVI or an adaptation running on the rover so I
                need to choose a onboard computer capable.

                Thanks,

                Weber

                _______________________________________________
                This message is sent to you from
                FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org
                <mailto:FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org> mailing list.
                Visit
                http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to
                manage your subscription
                For more information, check
                http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS




            _______________________________________________
            This message is sent to you fromfoss-...@lists.osgeo.org  
<mailto:FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org>  mailing list.
            Visithttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps  to manage 
your subscription
            For more information, checkhttp://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS


            _______________________________________________
            This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org
            <mailto:FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org> mailing list.
            Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to
            manage your subscription
            For more information, check
            http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS




-- Weber de Souza Calixto




-- Weber de Souza Calixto


    _______________________________________________
    This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org
    <mailto:FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org> mailing list.
    Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage
    your subscription
    For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS




_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your 
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS

_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your 
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS

Reply via email to