Well, hummm..
Post the two files if you can for others to tinker with. Recall that RTCM 1004 will not carry the Doppler that you might have originally had (so it may not be present in your RINEX files if that is what was converted), so you might be better of post processing with raw data (or MSM type RTCM if you get it). Doppler is very useful here, esp with L1 only. I have not used the baseline constraint in RTKLIB, so can not comment on its use or value here, would have to dig into the actual code. In any event, with the moving baseline method expect to see noticeable loses the positional estimate reported, in favor of a better estimate or the yaw and pitch. [you can see that with the two reference stations I pointed you to, in static you will see <5mm variation] This method is at its best for a ship or plane. If your antenna are set are too close ( say~<50 cm), or they interfere with each other (due to the down convert local oscillator crosstalk between identical GNSS devices), other issues will of course arise. Just some quick guesses.
Good luck, regards DCKelley


On 4/2/2016 5:02 PM, Marco Mendonça wrote:
Thanks, David!

I'm actually trying to post process two RINEX files on rtkpost from antennas on a car. I chose the moving baseline option, set the baseline length, but still, no solution.

When not setting the baseline length as fixed, it works fine. Although the estimated baseline is close to the real value, I'd like it to be fixed.

I'm also using moving baseline. With the length constraint, the results are noisy and only with 1.07% fixed epochs. Without the constraint, the fixed epochs are around 90% and much smoother and coherent. And I'm absolutely sure about the distance from antenna to antenna.

Also, thanks for the example provided! I'll connect there and try to debug my option choices. Any other guesses of what might be happening are greatly appreciated!

Regards,

Marco

    Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 15:09:23 -0700
    From: David Kelley <davidkel...@itsware.net>
    To: Open Source GPS-related discussion and support
            <foss-gps@lists.osgeo.org
    <mailto:foss-gps@lists.osgeo.org>>, mammendo...@gmail.com
    <mailto:mammendo...@gmail.com>Subject: Re: [FOSS-GPS] RTKLib fixed
    baseline length
    Message-ID: <57004313.4050...@itsware.net>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

    Marco :
    Works fine for me as well.
    There are no "special" switches, does it first work for you when
    stationary? Start with getting that to work as a first step.
    If you have it working in the mode "Kinematic" (ie normal moving rover
    RTK) or "Static" (ie stationary RTK where measurement noise is
    taken out
    in dithering the clock estimate more than the position), then
    "Moving-Base" should work as well.   I presume you know the reason for
    using this mode is often to get a precise estimate of the rovers
    heading.
    Here is an image of it working in that mode on short 130cm baseline.
    You can see that the two antenna are nearly, not not 100% located N-S
    with respect to each other.  The ~0.1 degree shift is because the West
    side of office building does not run a true north-south!   Feel
    free to
    connect to the SNIP NTRIP casters that are listed on the image
    below to
    confirm everything else is working.  [No user id is needed, and
    Serv2.itsware.net:2101 <http://serv2.itsware.net:2101/> is left up
    during the weekend. Not guarantees
    during the US work week as that is used a testing machine.]


    Good luck!
    Regards,  DC Kelley


- Marco Mendonça


_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your 
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS

--

--
Regards,
David Kelley
ITS Programs Manager, SubCarrier Systems Corp. (SCSC)
626-485-7528 (Cell) 626-513-7715 (Office) 888-950-8747 (Main)
_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your 
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS

Reply via email to