In average, without the constraint, they agree at a 5mm level with a standard deviation of 3 cm. It is a pretty reasonable solution given the dynamics, but I'd like this noise to be propagated to the other parameters being estimated, where they actually belong.
The antennas are experimental, so I don't have the antenna type or the phase centers, but they are both exactly the same, with the same orientation, so I think this effect is not the one to blame. And the baseline measurement was made with a caliper, down to the millimeter between the antenna mounts. If I can't figure this out, I'll keep with the unconstrained solution. Not a big deal, but also not the ideal solution. Thank you very much for the help Mr. Kelley and Dr. Nievinski! - Marco Mendonça On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Felipe G. Nievinski <fgnievin...@gmail.com> wrote: > How large is the difference between estimated baseline length and its > assumed value? I presumed it's been measured with a tape, between antennas > reference points (not the antenna phase centers)? Also, make sure you're > configuring the antenna models correctly in RTKLIB settings. > -FGN. > > _______________________________________________ > This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org mailing list. > Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your > subscription > For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS >
_______________________________________________ This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS@lists.osgeo.org mailing list. Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS