On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 13:18 -0800, Michael wrote: > And, as I recall, there > have been some posts here that show how you can add your > own markup right into your own repositories, if that is > your wish.
Someone showed how to integrate TinyMCE, which edits and produces HTML. (Like many programmers, there's hardly any tool I like less, but I'm happy for whomever it helps.) I didn't see anything that would make it possible to use Markdown or Textile or any other wiki format which is edited in plain text and produces HTML for viewing only. I've considered using a JavaScript Markdown implementation in my Fossil header to render Markdown text stored in the wiki to HTML on the fly, but I think the fossil wiki markup would conflict. If there already is a practical way for me to use my markup syntax of choice, then I'll happily learn that method and use it. > fossil is the *only* one that I look forward to using each time. Like I said, I really like fossil, too. It's my favorite, and I'm using it for all new projects (and migrating some old ones, too). Doesn't mean I can't want it to be even better though, right? -- Joshua Paine LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy http://letterblock.com/ 301-576-1920 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
