And with this you lose the interoperability of Fossil repositories. Go team.
2009/11/29 Jeremy Cowgar <jer...@cowgar.com> > For those that would like a real human formatting language it would be > worth > a dependency. For those that prefer to use HTML can simply not link in the > library. > > #ifdef MARKDOWN > #include <markdown.h> > #endif > > ... > > #ifdef MARKDOWN > output = ConvertMarkdown(rawText); > #endif > > ... > > $ gcc -DMARKDOWN fossil.c -o fossil > > Pretty easy, eh? Now, that's an over simplification but not by much. > > Jeremy > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Eric" <e...@deptj.eu> > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:44 AM > To: <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The case for Markdown (yes, I rtfm) > > > The number of mails about this just proves that there is no right choice > > for a new wiki markup. There are plenty of lightweight markup formats out > > there (with their own enthusiastic followers) that haven't even been > > mentioned here yet. If you want to do your project documentation a > > particular way, then do it that way - as project files. The other problem > > is introducing external dependencies for Fossil - have you noticed how > few > > there are? > > > > My vote (somebody else mentioned votes!) is to leave the Fossil wiki > alone > > (except for gradual improvement). > > > > > > Eric > > > > _______________________________________________ > > fossil-users mailing list > > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
