On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Zed A. Shaw <zeds...@zedshaw.com> wrote:
> Alright, so after a few more checks it looks like more recent fossils > seem to be "forgetting" that leaves are closed. I had to go in and > close all of them again. After I clone a repository I'll have *all* the > leaves open. > > Is this a change that's not mentioned? > Can you give more explanation of the problem? I cloned the repository (the one on 8080) and I see that it contains 2 closed leaves and 14 open leaves. I looked at all 5400 artifacts, and I see only 3 attempts to close leaves - two of which close the two closed leaves, and one that refers to a check-in that has no parents or children. (In the current implementation Check-ins without either parents or children are not considered to be leaves. You can argue that this is a bug, but on the other hand, the situation does not normally arise.) Are you saying that you closed more leaves than this but that the close-leaf artifacts are disappearing from the repository? > > -- > Zed A. Shaw > http://zedshaw.com/ > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
