On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:55:06PM -0400, Joshua Paine wrote: > So this sounds like maybe has more to do with the changing definition of > leaf? > > FWIW, I would *not* expect that merging a branch would close it. In > fact, I routinely assume that it does not, as I merge back and forth > sometimes between trunk and feature branches to apply bugfixes or > freestanding subfeatures from one to the other.
Branches are not leaves. A leaf is unnamed while a branch has a name. Branches shouldn't close, but an unnamed leaf that gets merged should just go away. -- Zed A. Shaw http://zedshaw.com/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
