> > Yes. It is one of my plans, the reasons I joined here, to extend fossil with > tcl. Whether that's ought to be jimtcl (for size and embedding concerncs) or > the real full-blown tcl (for compatibility with the language and all the > software out there), I haven't come to a decision yet. Of course the > single-file approach of fossil has to be kept up. So if you want to include a > standard library, starpacks etc. come into play.. >
Has you looked at the "tcl-integration" branch in Fossil? It has experimental changes to allow "full-blown" Tcl to be used in Fossil. It allows Tcl and TH1 to call into each other. Currently, I've only modified the MSVC makefile; however, I was hoping somebody would help me to add the necessary configure magic to link with Tcl on Unix. -- Joe Mistachkin _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
