On 09/20/11 13:00, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
<flatw...@users.sourceforge.net <mailto:flatw...@users.sourceforge.net>>
wrote:
While I *am* a Tcl aficionado, for me, one of the Fossil's selling
points is its self-containment and a minimal set of dependencies.
That's the beauty of jimtcl - it's already there and required (or
optionally used) by the build process, so deps aren't a problem here.
Dependencies on the source level never are a concern (if the license is right)
because we can import anything into some subdirectory of fossil's fossil. It's
run-time dependencies that count. Yes, jim fares well there, too, but I have
other concerns with it...
-Martin
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
