On Nov 18, 2011, at 3:41 AM, Tomek Kott wrote: > If we have granular permissions for tickets, then we should probably also > have it for the wiki (view attachments, view history), we should also > separate attach and delete for wiki and tickets, and maybe even throw in > permissions related to the timeline and files (such as view newest view > hitsory, view patch, view diff) and maybe even download zip instead of tar > file. Don't forget about tags and even open and closed names. You could > EVEN create permissions for each artifact! That would just be easier, > because you wouldn't need to worry about the type. > > OR > > We could realize that to do this properly would require a good CMS, which > fossil is not, and keep it simple.
You know that by similar funny "implications" we can "prove" that most of Fossil is actually redundant... Actually, why do we even have a permission system, if Fossil is an internal development tool? Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
