On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 06:41:54PM +0100, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:30:16 -0500 Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > > > I’m in the same boat, doing two actions for every one in other SCM > > systems, however I do not do it dozens of times a day, so I’ve always > > just done it with a little gnashing of the teeth. > > If we're having a vote, +1. I'd like it if rm and mv actually deleted > and renamed files.
I think I favour it. But then we have to decide what to do, if the files had changes. "fossil revert" would not bring in the changes. And I don't think the 'remove' or 'rename' operations should change the undo buffer. Maybe the commands should require "-f" (force), if there are changes. Regards, Lluís. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
