On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Gour <g...@atmarama.net> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:25:19 -0500 > Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > I fear to change it now, though, since it might really mess up people > > who are used to the older style. > > What about having something like: > > fossil rm --force|-f FILE1 FILE2 ... > > where using '--force' option would make Fossil remove files fromn *both* > the project and the disk? >
I'm leaning more toward Fossil 2.0 that has a number of incompatible changes to the command-line interface, such as having "fossil rm" and "fossil mv" actually delete and rename the files. To be clear, the repository file format and the sync protocol would continue to be compatible, so Fossil 1.x can interact with Fossil 2.x projects. Only the operation of the various "fossil" commands would change, and only in ways that improve the interface, based on past experience. Assuming we go with Fossil 2.0, can somebody propose a list of interface changes that are needed. We don't want to repeat this exercise if it can be avoided, so let's fix everything all at once. Here's a start: (1) "fossil rm" removes the files from the disk (2) "fossil mv" renames the files on disk > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > > -- > The senses are so strong and impetuous, O Arjuna, > that they forcibly carry away the mind even of a man > of discrimination who is endeavoring to control them. > > http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
