My preference would be to keep the color SBS diffs, at least as a skin option or something, since I find it easier to notice changes and match them up. Maybe somewhere in the documentation on the header / skin, there could be css for a default coloring of the sbs diffs that one could copy into the header?
Tomek On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jan Danielsson <jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 02/03/12 16:25, Richard Hipp wrote: > [---] > > Are there strong preferences one way or another? > > There are two aspects I prefer with the original: > - I think color coding makes it easier to get a quick overview of > what's happened in a diff. ("I see a lot of red" is roughly > "optimizations", "I see a lot of green" is roughly "New features"). > - I haven't looked at the code lately, but does the web sbsdiff > support the width argument in some manner? For quite a few diffs I've > been looking at lately, static 80 characters wide panes leaves a lot of > empty "wasted" space, due to short lines. > > Those points aside, I strongly support the idea of unifying the two, > so overall I'm for the retro sbsdiff. > > -- > Kind regards, > Jan Danielsson > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users