My preference would be to keep the color SBS diffs, at least as a skin
option or something, since I find it easier to notice changes and match
them up. Maybe somewhere in the documentation on the header / skin, there
could be css for a default coloring of the sbs diffs that one could copy
into the header?

Tomek

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jan Danielsson
<jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 02/03/12 16:25, Richard Hipp wrote:
> [---]
> > Are there strong preferences one way or another?
>
>    There are two aspects I prefer with the original:
>   - I think color coding makes it easier to get a quick overview of
> what's happened in a diff. ("I see a lot of red" is roughly
> "optimizations", "I see a lot of green" is roughly "New features").
>   - I haven't looked at the code lately, but does the web sbsdiff
> support the width argument in some manner? For quite a few diffs I've
> been looking at lately, static 80 characters wide panes leaves a lot of
> empty "wasted" space, due to short lines.
>
>   Those points aside, I strongly support the idea of unifying the two,
> so overall I'm for the retro sbsdiff.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Jan Danielsson
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to