On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:10 AM, <org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com>wrote:

> On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:53:35 -0400
> Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:42 AM,
> > <org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com>wrote:
> > > Is it possible to avoid squashing all private commits into one?
> > >
> >
> > The branch is private.  If all the individual commits where pushed
> > out to the world, it wouldn't be private any more and the whole
> > purpose of having a private branch would be defeated, no?
> >
>
> That's one interpretation of private, yes. I took it to mean that the
> branch wouldn't be synced, or visible, on any remotes. I don't think
> that necessarily implies coalescing commits like that...
>
> If it's not possible, I can live with it, I'll just switch to only using
> public branches.


It sounds like the request would be able to switch a branch from private to
public. That seems like it would be a very powerful feature (assuming it is
not already possible?).


>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to