On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:09 PM, <org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com>wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:10:44 +0000 > <org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:53:35 -0400 > > Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:42 AM, > > > <org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com>wrote: > > > > Is it possible to avoid squashing all private commits into one? > > > > > > > > > > The branch is private. If all the individual commits where pushed > > > out to the world, it wouldn't be private any more and the whole > > > purpose of having a private branch would be defeated, no? > > > > > > > That's one interpretation of private, yes. I took it to mean that the > > branch wouldn't be synced, or visible, on any remotes. I don't think > > that necessarily implies coalescing commits like that... > > > > If it's not possible, I can live with it, I'll just switch to only > > using public branches. > > Is it possible to get those commits into trunk in any way? Losing the > details isn't acceptable (due to my misunderstanding of exactly what > a private branch entailed). > I don't think so, not other than checking each one out and recommitting them one by one. To do otherwise would be changing the history of the project, which Fossil does not allow (by design). > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
