On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Nolan Darilek <no...@thewordnerd.info>wrote:
> Fossil is generally fine, but I keep tripping over that one screen I > reported yesterday whenever I edit a commit to add a release tag. Still > have to admit to being entirely unsure why the checkboxes aren't redundant, > but thanks for working on this. I'll check out the new changes and report > back soon. > Thanks :). i agree that they are redundant, but i also share Richard's concern that it "just doesn't look right" (my words, not his) without the checkbox. i think Steve H's solution is really good compromise, allowing the user to ignore the checkboxes for most cases and to uncheck if he really wants to (granted, some users will check it before clicking in the textfield, which is basically the status quo). And it cost us less than 1 line of code (just extended an existing line). That said, if you find a nicer solution, i'm all ears. i've got my dev machine for the weekend, so i can make changes more significant than what i can do in vi (which isn't much, but my netbook (which i have during the week) can't handle too much xemacs/gcc). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
