2012/11/26 Stefan Bellon <sbel...@sbellon.de>:
> On Mon, 26 Nov, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
>
>> Finally, I had a look at the "bellon-unicode" branch. I like the new
>> "--no-warnings" flag, being less dangerous as the --force flag.
>
> The question is whether the naming of this new option is a good one
Agreed, choosing a good name is important. I like the name
--no-warnings, but another name would be OK for me as
well. Whatever name, I will use it in stead of the more
'dangerous' -f or --force.
> (in ClearCase you
> have -force, in SVN you have --force, in Perforce you have -f, in MKS
> you have --batch, in TFS you have -noprompt, ...).
Therefore, it would nice that -f or --force works as well: subversion
or Perforce users don't need to learn anything, if they accept that
-f/--force means more than just disable the warnings.
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
