On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Jan Nijtmans <jan.nijtm...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> D 2013-08-16T12:58:44.182 >> T +closed 6d42bcbef1a19fce44d20c43869399387b99a97b >> T +closed abfc26f6da112a56821946ae9dff3fee8a0aa205 >> U jan.nijtmans >> Z .... >> >> However, the manifest_parse() function doesn't accept >> this combined control artifact because T-cards should >> be in strict lexographical order. But .... in this >> case the two T-cards are for different uuid's, so >> they don't conflict in any way! >> >> Therefore I propose to relax the restriction a little >> such that this is allowed: T-cards should still be >> in strict lexographical order, but the artifact-id's >> should be taken into account first. >> > > No. The correct fix is to put the T cards in the right order. > I think what Jan is really proposing is that order check include the hash-keys so that a single control artifact could apply the same tag to more than 1 other artifact.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
