On 18 August 2013 17:43, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> 1) on host S: clone project from host S (http://S/my_repo)
>> 2) on host C: clone project from host S (http://S/my_repo)
>> 3) on host C: do some work, and commit changes
>> 4) on host S, 'fossil up'
>> 5) on host S: 'fossil timeline' doesn't show the recent commit
>> 6) on host S: 'fossil pull' doesn't show the commit either in 'fossil
>> timeline'
>> 7) on host C: do more work, and commit changes
>> 8) on host 'S': 'fossil up'; now all recent commits are seen
>
>
> It sounds almost like you have autosync turned off - do 'up' and 'pull' show
> any network traffic?

Tbh I forgot - the error-situation is gone now, sadly.

>> Related question: I typically use 'fossil up', and never 'fossil sync'
>> (or pull/push) in my workflow, working on 2 hosts on the same project
>> - should I?
>
>
> That doesn't sound wrong. If autosync is on there is rarely a need for
> push/pull. Do an 'up' when you start working, to make sure you aren't
> working from what would become a fork, and it will sync/push when you commit
> (if autosync is on).

Right.

If it comes up again, I'll try to keep it as-is, if that's possible,
and post it on here - who knows.

Michai
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to