On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> FWIW: Fossil was never intended to be a round-trip safety hatch for other >> SCMs which aren't as data-robust. Maybe convince the git developers to move >> their metadata into sqlite instead? > > Being able to round-trip this way might allow more users to test-drive Fossil. > > Getting radical architectural changes to git accepted seems likely to > be impossible. I'd rather convince the Fossil developers/community to > support the git features we need:
BTW, another thing is that if Fossil could support git remote repos to push to, that would be great. Yes, tickets and wiki artifacts would't go. But it'd allow one to push to github/gitorious/... repos from Fossil workspaces. Yes, there's Chiselapp, but I think there's value in this. Get users hooked, then direct them to Fossil and Chiselapp for all that which git lacks. Nico -- _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
