On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Andy Goth <andrew.m.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/29/2014 11:04 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > In such a case Fossil would record both commits but store the > > file's contents in a single artifact (because it recognizes them by > > SHA1 hash, and the hash would be the same). i.e. it would not > > duplicate the content, only the record of the change. > > The neat thing about this situation is that when you look at the > artifact info page, it will show the artifact as being part of multiple > commits, including those tagged with different branches. This way you > can track down all the times when you had a given version. I'm also > reasonably sure it'll also work for the case of multiple filenames > mapping to the same contents. Does Fossil hash only the file content or does it include meta data, such as the file name, in the hash, as well?
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
