On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> But seriously, though, your argument is a good reason not to use -m and > rely on $EDITOR instead. i think my problem is that i regularly use 2 > (sometimes 3) SCMs, namely fossil, svn, and (sometimes) git, often over a > remote connection on systems with no emacs installed (and emacs takes too > long to start for a short commit message). So -m just kind of became baked > in to my fingers at some point :/. > I don't know about emacs, but there was (maybe still is) a minimal version of vi I used to use for situations like this. Maybe there is a minimal version of emacs? (I suppose, technically, an old enough version could be considered "minimal", but I mean an actively maintained project whose goal was (is?) to provide a lightweight version with a small, but complaint, subset of the features.)
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
