On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:14 PM, B Harder <brad.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) how complex is the structure/relation that needs to be popped to do > the operation as cleanly as possible > On the surface it's really simple because we're guaranteed that there are no references to the top-most item. The details Richard mentioned, e.g. making sure there are no deltas referring to the content you're removing, are what i remember struggling with (on paper). i'll see if i can find the post i wrote about it (on fossil-dev) sometime... 6-9 months ago, i think. > 2) how much cheat room is allowed during the course of this > development whereby perhaps a single card/obj could be deleted, and > the "dangling" bits would be culled w/ a [f rebuild] ? > Only top-most commit (and any unique artifacts it introduced, e.g. new files or deltas vs older ones) could potentially be popped, or at least that's my understanding. > 3) I can't think of anything else... > You will. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
