On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Actually... i use the flat view more often than not. That's probably
>>>> just historical momentum (and the way my old menus are all set up). i
>>>> wouldn't whine about loss of flat view, but also won't argue for its
>>>> removal.
>>>>
>>>
>>> flat mode meaning /dir instead of /tree.
>>>
>>
>> Yes.  And remember, I'm not going to make /dir go away - I'm just wanting
>> to take away its prominent links on the menu bar.  The pages will all still
>> be there for those who want them.  But links to those pages won't clutter
>> the screen for people who do not.
>>
>
> Another thought about tree/flat view. Maybe the default for large (by some
> definition of large) repos should be flat mode. I just tried loading
> http://netbsd.sonnenberger.org/tree?ci=tip and took over 2 minutes!
>

I just tested it with the latest fossil trunk (that server is using a
version almost a year old). While the page on the current server is 12+MB,
the same page, if they were to update the fossil version, is 29+MB! I
definitely think that there should at least be an option to make flat view
the default.

-- 
˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to