On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Actually... i use the flat view more often than not. That's probably >>>>> just historical momentum (and the way my old menus are all set up). i >>>>> wouldn't whine about loss of flat view, but also won't argue for its >>>>> removal. >>>>> >>>> >>>> flat mode meaning /dir instead of /tree. >>>> >>> >>> Yes. And remember, I'm not going to make /dir go away - I'm just >>> wanting to take away its prominent links on the menu bar. The pages will >>> all still be there for those who want them. But links to those pages won't >>> clutter the screen for people who do not. >>> >> >> Another thought about tree/flat view. Maybe the default for large (by >> some definition of large) repos should be flat mode. I just tried loading >> http://netbsd.sonnenberger.org/tree?ci=tip and took over 2 minutes! >> > > I just tested it with the latest fossil trunk (that server is using a > version almost a year old). While the page on the current server is 12+MB, > the same page, if they were to update the fossil version, is 29+MB! I > definitely think that there should at least be an option to make flat view > the default. >
How many separate files are in that project? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
