> The current skinning mechanism > (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/customskin.md) gives > the developers complete control over the header and footer of the > document, which means that the skin developer can add as much JS or > .less as he wants.
Right, that is how I am doing it for lack of an better solution, but find it a bit hackish, especially when the javascript gets large. Moreover the javascript could be cached by the browser if it was not directly inline in the HTML. > That said, a key feature of Fossil is the ability to operate > disconnected - without an internet connection. I'm not an expert on > Bootstrap, but I don't think it works that way. There may be a misunderstanding in my use case : I was talking about javascript that would be served by fossil, not by a CDN or whatever server (so that fossil continues to operate offline). As of Bootstrap, it would be perfectly OK to have Bootstrap css/js served by fossil, there is no requirement to get it from internet. And I am not trying to push for the use of Bootstrap, it's just that it's really hard to get CSS right on multiple browser (at list for a casual stylesheet writer like me) ! _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
