On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> On 9/11/15, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > >> I'm not sure "--undo" is the right name for this option. Other > >> suggestions? > >> > > > > --from-undo > > or: > > --from undo (special-case name) > > > > The code on trunk now does "fossil diff --undo". I'm very open to > changes in the name of that option, though. Maybe "--from-undo" is > slightly better, but not a great deal. > > Adding support for "undo" as a special-case name of "--from" seems > problematic since that would make it harder to do a diff against a > branch named "undo". > > "fossil diff --versus-undo" maybe??? > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > Looking at the "fossil checkout" command, there is ?VERSION? parameter and this parameter can be replaced with "--latest". Since the "fossil diff" command already has ?--from VERSION? and ?--to VERSION?, perhaps a similar convention can be used: "fossil diff --from --update" or "fossil diff --to --update" Not sure which would be more appropriate...
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
