On 9/11/15, to...@acm.org <to...@acm.org> wrote: > Although I think --undo is not too bad as it clearly does not make sense to > 'undo' a diff, another alternative that is less 'verbal' that might work is > > diff --back (as in "diff with what would be there if I were to go back, or > back out the recent changes...")
+1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Hipp > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 8:27 PM > To: Fossil SCM user's discussion > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] diff after update > > On 9/11/15, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> diff --undo sounds like you’re asking it to undo the diff, which makes no >> sense. > > I agree. I'm just having trouble coming up with an alternative. > >> >> How does “fossil diff --last” strike you? > > Still a little generic, I think, but moving in the right direction. > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
