Ah you don't understand again what I've said ...
1/ Fossil and SQLite work together, and to be clear, the same guy work for both
projects.I was even told that the AIM of Fossil is to help SQLite.Do you agree
at least with these ?
2/ When you plan things you are supposed to create a Gantt chart or something
which help any project.For instance, something serious not something
else.You've said it : Oct 24 Fossil, Nov 04 SQLite.I AM SO happy that you've
wrote it.
Explain me why a SO serious project could not wait for 10 days or if it is not
that possible (I don't see why ??), why don't Fossil create a 1.36.1?
[too much] Pride ? Huh ?
My point was : Why do Fossil show a 1.36 FEW days BEFORE SQLite.
(FEW days IS the key of MY point of view before yours)
Best Regards
K.
De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it>
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user
<ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Beyond that, I don't understand why SQlite is not 3.15.1 ...
Seems to me that SQLite 3.15.1 was released on november the 4th, while
fossil 1.36 was compiled on october the 24th.
Anyway, I cannot find checksums for 1.36 here
<http://www.hwaci.com/fossil_download_checksums.html>.
Luca
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
