> « [...] I have no idea what you think I wrote. [etc...] »
Ah ?No the answer was for Luca not for you, Scott ... ! :-D Of, course, little software may not need Gantt software, however it is better to use such a tool.I will answer all the rest when I could but not now... Best Regards K. De : Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 18h38 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains 64bit binary On Nov 11, 2016 5:28 PM, "K. Fossil user" <ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > > Ah you don't understand again what I've said ... > > 1/ Fossil and SQLite work together, and to be clear, the same guy work for > both projects. > I was even told that the AIM of Fossil is to help SQLite. > Do you agree at least with these ?Yes, fossil & sqlite have a beneficial > symbiotic relationship.> 2/ When you plan things you are supposed to create a > Gantt chart or something which help any project. > For instance, something serious not something else. > You've said it : Oct 24 Fossil, Nov 04 SQLite. > I AM SO happy that you've wrote it.I have no idea what you think I wrote. > Gantt charts are not requirements for successful software. I've written some > very successful software projects that have been recognized with industry > awards without ever using a gantt chart. DRH makes new fossil releases > periodically for the community but he generally suggests using the tip of > trunk as he usually does himself.> Explain me why a SO serious project could > not wait for 10 days or if it is not that possible (I don't see why ??), why > don't Fossil create a 1.36.1?Fossil has never used semantic versioning. I > don't understand the reason for your continued emphasis on 10 days. Perhaps > the reason is that people are imperfect, or that they have different > priorities than you, or that they have simply started blocking your emails > due to the in your face "I'm right and anyone who disagrees with me is a > fool" style attitude that comes across in your messages. No, that is not a > quote from you, but it is how you come across.There are ways to communicate > that invite people to see your point of view. There are other ways to > communicate that make people dislike your message no matter how correct it > might be.> > [too much] Pride ? Huh ? > > My point was : Why do Fossil show a 1.36 FEW days BEFORE SQLite. > (FEW days IS the key of MY point of view before yours)I believe I addressed > this above.> > > Best Regards > > K. > > > ________________________________ > De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it> > > À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> > Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38 > Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains > 64bit binary > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user > <ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > > Beyond that, I don't understand why SQlite is not 3.15.1 ... > > Seems to me that SQLite 3.15.1 was released on november the 4th, while > fossil 1.36 was compiled on october the 24th. > > Anyway, I cannot find checksums for 1.36 here > <http://www.hwaci.com/fossil_download_checksums.html>. > > Luca > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users