On Dec 10, 2017, at 7:40 PM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote: > > Thus said Richard Hipp on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 19:20:59 -0500: > >> Minor correction: the hash algorithm changes was from SHA1 to >> SHA3-256. > > I would call that a major correction! I knew something didn't seem right > about what I sent…
To clarify the clarification, “SHA256” and “SHA3-256” are not the same thing, though they are sometimes confused. “SHA256” should only be used to refer to the 256-bit variant of SHA-2, which like SHA-3, was standardized in several variants with different hash sizes. Thus drh’s choice of terminology: “SHA3-256”. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
