Erik Moeller wrote: > 2009/1/16 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com>: > >> Erik Moeller wrote: >> >> >>> I think requiring attribution-by-history should be the best practice >>> for heavily edited articles, at least until we more prominently point >>> out the author credit in the article footer. >>> >>> >> Eh? Which should it be? A requirement, or a best practise? >> > > What I meant is, 'requiring attribution-by-history-reference seems > like the most reasonable attribution requirement, at least > unless/until attribution is more visible on the article page itself.' >
If you are going to qualify things as finely as "seems like the most reasonable attribution requirement"; wouldn't it be much more useful to use language like "recommend" or "suggest" instead of "require"? Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
