Erik Moeller wrote: > > * The attribution terms should avoid requiring specific reference to > Wikipedia, so that it's clear that there is not necessarily a tie > between the project in which collaboration currently happens, and any > future use of the content. If someone creates a better alternative to > Wikipedia where the content is used, why should it be continued to be > attributed to Wikipedia, rather than the authors? >
I must be a moron or at least functionally illiterate, since I simply cannot parse the previous paragraph in a way that makes logical sense. Let me try though... Okay. Content should be attributed to authors... Ouch! Wait... Sorry, still can't parse it in context... Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
