On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> 2009/1/21 Nikola Smolenski <smole...@eunet.yu>: > > I'm not sure that these positions should be balanced. For example, > everyone > > who believes that an URL should be fine is also OK if all names are > given, > > but not the other way around. > > That's evidently not true. Many people in this debate have said that > giving all names encumbers re-use of the work when such lists get very > long, so they are not 'fine' with listing all names, because they > recognize that there is an additional good (ease of re-use) that needs > to be served. But they granted a license to use their work under the GFDL, didn't they? The GFDL certainly allows listing all names, doesn't it? If you're saying these people have a right to revoke the GFDL from their work, well, I won't argue against you. But I find it strange that you would argue this. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l