2009/1/22 Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>wrote: >> It all boils down to how you define "reasonable", and that's usually >> left to laymen, not lawyers. >> > > Which is why I for one say shame on CC for using such crappy > phrasing. Essentially they're saying "require attribution, but what > form that attribution comes in is what author(s) deem to be > reasonable."
It's what a jury deems reasonable, rather than the author(s), isn't it? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
