2009/3/4 Marco Chiesa <chiesa.ma...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org> wrote: > >> >> And yes, 80% of people ranked one of 4 options which I consider >> unacceptable >> first. But then, 67% of people would have done so even if everyone chose >> their answers randomly. > > > Now, how many of the 20% who wants their name cited would have given the > same response to something like: "Would you be happy to piss everyone off if > your name does not appear in a list of about 100 authors of a Wikipedia > article cited by Xyz?"
Do we really want to only listen to the opinions of those people actually willing to make a fuss if they don't get their way? I imagine most Wikimedians are sufficiently mature to accept it if the majority disagree with them. (This is assuming only options actually legal under the license are considered.) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
