> 2009/5/14 Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net>: >> I suggest that Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not include Wikipedia is not >> a >> manual of sexual practices. It could be phrased Wikipedia is not the >> Karma Sutra. > > What about pictures of Muhammad? Descriptions of Chinese human rights > violations? Articles about evolution? etc. etc. etc. > > The reason that Wikipedia is not censored is because we cannot censor > one thing and maintain neutrality without censoring everything else > that might offend somebody and we would end up without anything left. >
I'm sure there is a name for this logical fallacy, but I'm not going to spend hours looking for it. I assume that when you appear in public you cover your private parts. It does not follow that you need to cover every part of yourself. Fred Bauder _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
