On 15 May 2009, at 08:01, Nikola Smolenski wrote: > Perhaps this is off-topic, but I wanted to say it for a long time. The > more time passes, the more I wonder if people who work on Wikipedia > have > ever seen an encyclopedia. On Wikipedia, dictionary definitions and > image galleries are forbidden, and stubs are frowned upon. Yet every > encyclopedia I have ever seen has dictionary definitions, and image > galleries, and stubs-a-plenty. > > I guess that conclusion is that we are doing something wrong.
They're not forbidden: they're just in a different location (Wiktionary and Commons). Could you clarify what you mean by "stubs are frowned upon"? The only reason I can think of for that is that it would be better if they were developed into better articles rather than left as stubs... Mike _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l