On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Tomasz Ganicz <polime...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip> > So, the replacing current ugly-copyvio-template -> OTRS scheme for > something else must take into consideration various scenarios which > are currently handled by that scheme in quite often teribbly > unfriendly style but anyway it is at least handled. > > So, the point is that we must "seek and destroy" copyvio and on the > other hand we want to stay friendly, try to assume goodwill, and try > to remain to be "just click and edit" wiki project... Tomek, I think you fundamentally misunderstood. I didn't suggest replacing OTRS for all scenarios. I only suggested creating a more standardized approach for those scenarios where an experienced Wikipedian is trying to obtain permission to add materials that he knows are owned by someone else. I believe this is the case that Milos was discussing in the start of the thread (unless I misunderstood something myself). Yes, there are other scenarios we have to deal with, and perhaps some of them could in fact be helped by the development of standardized permission forms, but I was never suggesting that all of OTRS should be replaced. -Robert Rohde _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
