On 2 April 2010 08:15, Samuel Klein <meta...@gmail.com> wrote: > Someone on the OSM threads commented that they make an effort to be > 'whiter than white' when it comes to observing all possible legal > nuances. And it occurs to me that OSM at its heart is much more > deeply concerned with reuse and guaranteeing zero hassles for reusers > than Wikimedia currently is.
It varies. Geographical data is a particularly weak area for wikipedia. > [can you name a significant published > work that draws heavily from a Wikimedia project, other than those > produced by Wikipedians that consist entirely of an edited selection > of Wikipedia articles?] Encyclopedia Britannica uses a lot of commons images these days. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
