HI, Before calling it a night I would like to point out the final paragraph of the statement.
"In saying this, we don't intend to create new policy, but rather to reaffirm and support policy that already exists. We encourage Wikimedia editors to scrutinize potentially offensive materials with the goal of assessing their educational or informational value, and to remove them from the projects if there is no such value." Jan-Bart de Vreede Vice Chair Wikimedia Board of Trustees WIkimedia Foundation On 7 mei 2010, at 21:49, Thomas Dalton wrote: > On 7 May 2010 20:45, Jan-Bart de Vreede <janb...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Speaking for myself I can state that Jimmy is a part of the community and >> that the board statement is in support of both his and the other >> administrators who have taken the initiative to clean up commons. >> >> Also, I would refer you to Jimmy's talk page on commons, as there is an >> active discussion going on there. > > The board statement doesn't seem to be suggesting people take > unilateral action. If that is what you meant, you should have made it > explicit. The default in the Wikimedia movement is to discuss things > before taking action, not after, so that is what most people will have > interpreted your statement as meaning. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
