It still works, it's just harder. And I'm totally with you on the second point. Jimmy got a needed process started. Could he have started it a different, less dramatic way? Probably. Would that have been better? Probably. As effective? Probably not. If you're looking to masturbate, Commons is among the best, most available, and easiest to navigate sources of material there is - the community can fix that and decide as a whole what to do, and should, but maybe Jimmy is playing the maverick and providing a giant leap toward that discussion.
~A On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 16:52, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) That argument doesn't apply to old artwork. 2) It is for the > community to decide what is and isn't educational, not Jimmy. (The > board acting collectively could overrule the community, but they don't > seem to have done that.) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
