On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:14 AM, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:14 PM, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Samuel Klein <meta...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Wedrna, later: >>>> The *ONLY* rating and classification system that I can support >>>> is a descriptive one. That is, it describes the nature of the >>>> content, and allows humans or computers to filter it accordingly. >>>> The infrastructure would be technically simple. >>> >>> Yes. Our categorization system already exists and should suffice. >> >> Our categorisation system is mentioned in any W3C Recommendation. > > is = isn't
I see what you mean. SJ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l