On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Austin Hair <adh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lodewijk <lodew...@effeietsanders.org> wrote: >> However, I am missing why it was decided to decrease the size of the >> logo. It definitely looks more professional, but also somewhat less >> friendly to me. Maybe it is just me, maybe not - I just would like to >> understand the rationale first. >> >> And is there any chance that the middle horizontal line is made >> slightly less intense? Right now, the attention is drawn there (at >> least for me) instead of the open part at the top. It gives me a >> slight impression as if the bowl is about to burst. Which is of course >> a valid representation of the truth with all community uproar lately, >> but I don't think it should be our message :) > > It was jarring at first, and I'll grant that the initial shock > (seriously, somehow this slipped under my radar entirely) accounts for > most of my aversion, but I have to agree with Lodewijk.
I think you missed it because it wasn't really discussed before as part of the vector update... right? I admit I didn't read all the announcements, but was this discussed/announced earlier? -- phoebe _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
