On 5/23/2010 1:58 PM, Philippe Beaudette wrote: > tbh, I'm very fond of "Double check". It seems to imply exactly what > we want: the edit isn't being accepted automatically, nor rejected, > but simply getting a second look. It's fairly neutral in tone, and > understandable to the average person.
Except unless we consider the initial edit to be the first check, its not correct. Only one person independent from the editor is reviewing each edit. -- Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
