On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Philippe Beaudette <pbeaude...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > tbh, I'm very fond of "Double check". It seems to imply exactly what > we want: the edit isn't being accepted automatically, nor rejected, > but simply getting a second look. It's fairly neutral in tone, and > understandable to the average person.
I agree. Simple words are good. Thanks, Richard (User:Pharos) > Philippe > (speaking in my capacity as a volunteer, and not as an employee of the > Foundation) > > On May 23, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Still Waterising wrote: > >> I think "Pending Revisions" is an excellent name. No need to look >> further. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l