geni wrote: > On 24 July 2010 18:28, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> - That IPs are shown a mildly "censored" version, and that seeing the >> uncensored version of Wikipedia requires registering an account and setting >> the preferences up accordingly. >> > > And this is where it all breaks down. Once you start to offer a > partially censored version as standard you are basically going to have > to fight an eternal war until you give up and reacht he bottom of the > slippery slope. >
No you don't. There are some on flickr that want to publish their art nudes as 'safe' content, and others that want to post bukkake as 'moderate' or whatever. They tehn complain when flickr ban them from posting any image as 'safe'. They can still post images but they will all be made moderate, or restricted. Most of the 'Adult' content posting community have little sympathy for the complainants. And whilst the system is perfect you don't generally stumble across porn unless you go looking for it. To work the content categories need to be few and broad otherwise the system will be too complicated. Also the boundaries between one category and the next somewhat elastic otherwise people will game it. When moderating content if in doubt move it up to the next higher restriction, because people can always override it if they chose. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
